ArticleHormone research in paediatrics2022
Histopathological Criteria for Paediatric Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
Article in Hormone research in paediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- CpG hypermethylation and WNT/AP-1 cooperativity define the epigenetic landscape and a clinical subgroup of high-risk pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Histopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Pediatric Adrenocortical Tumors: where Do we Stand?Endocrine pathology · 2026Review
- Exploring DNA topoisomerase II alpha in adrenocortical carcinoma through multi-omics analysis: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025Article
- Adrenocortical tumor manifesting as virilizing in a female child: Adenoma or carcinoma? A rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Pediatric Adrenocortical Neoplasms: A Study Comparing Three Histopathological Scoring Systems.Endocrine pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is diagnosed in paediatric patients at 5 months after symptom onset on average, and 38% die during the first 2.5 years of follow-up. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of Weiss, Van Slooten, and Wieneke histopathological ACC classifications for predicting follow-up prognosis in a paediatric population.
methodsData were retrieved from medical records of 57 patients aged <18 years who underwent surgical treatment for ACC with surgical follow-up over 6 months or death due to ACC. They were classified into either good (without recurrence/death due to ACC) or poor (with recurrence/death due to ACC) prognosis group. Two expert pathologists classified the ACC surgical specimens according to the Weiss, Van Slooten, and Wieneke criteria.
resultsThe median follow-up duration was 126 (18-225) months in 38 males (66.7%) and 19 females (33.3%) (median age: 3 [1-6.5] years). The good prognosis group was younger than the poor prognosis group (median age: 3 [1.5-6.2] years vs. 5 [2-10] years). Seventeen (29.8%) patients in the poor prognosis group died due to ACC within the first 50 months of surgical follow-up; the earliest death occurred in the fourth follow-up month, and the majority of deaths occurred within 24 months of follow-up. The accuracies of Weiss, Van Slooten, and Wieneke classification systems were 40%, 47%, and 77%, respectively. DISCUSSION/
conclusionThe Wieneke classification showed the best accuracy but was not sufficiently precise to establish reliable prognosis for ACC in the paediatric population. The Wieneke classification had approximately 95% sensitivity and negative predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.