ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2022
Mortality from Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a deep learning model for survival prediction in heart failure: competing risk and frailty model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of Mortality from Multiple Causes in Heart Failure Categorized by Ejection Fraction.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Does the BUN/Cr Ratio Confer a Worse Prognosis in All Ejection Fraction Spectra?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support for monitoring patients in cardiovascular ICUs: A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Prognosis of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: A Story or a Version?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic importance of the classification 'heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (EF)' remains uncertain.
objectiveTo analyze the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality of patients classified as having HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF - EF: 40%-49%), and to compare them to those of patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF - EF > 50%) and with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF - EF < 40%) on admission for decompensated HF.
methodsAmbispective cohort of patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit due to decompensated HF. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and in-hospital and late mortality were assessed. The software R was used, with a 5% significance, for the tests chi-square, analysis of variance, Cox multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve, in addition to machine-learning techniques (Elastic Net and survival tree).
results519 individuals were included between September 2011 and June 2019 (mean age, 74.87 ± 13.56 years; 57.6% were men). The frequencies of HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were 25.4%, 27% and 47.6%, respectively. Previous infarction was more frequent in HFmrEF. The mean follow-up time was 2.94 ± 2.55 years, with no statistical difference in mortality between the groups (53.8%, 52.1%, 57.9%). In the survival curve, there was difference between neither the HFpEF and HFmrEF groups, nor the HFpEF and HFrEF groups, but between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups. Age over 77 years, previous HF, history of readmission, dementia and need for vasopressors were associated with higher late mortality in the survival tree.
conclusionThe EF was not selected as a variable associated with mortality in patients with decompensated HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.