Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508025›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2022

Fertility trends during successive novel infectious disease outbreaks: Zika and COVID-19 in Brazil.

Leticia Junqueira Marteleto, Luiz Gustavo Fernandes Sereno, Raquel Zanatta Coutinho, Molly Dondero, Sandra Valongueiro Alves, Ryan Lloyd, Andrew Koepp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leticia Junqueira MarteletoUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-4234-0129
Luiz Gustavo Fernandes SerenoUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-9490-2379
Raquel Zanatta CoutinhoFaculdade de Ciências Econômicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-1480
Molly DonderoAmerican University, Washington DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-3075
Sandra Valongueiro AlvesUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8532-5346
Ryan LloydUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2544-2652
Andrew KoeppUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-6976-8507

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI UMBERSON, DEBRA J. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Reproductive Responses to the Zika Virus Epidemic in BrazilR01HD091257 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Leticia J Marteleto · 2018 to 2026
$5.8M
Program Development and Pilot CoreP30AG066614 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KAREN L FINGERMAN · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066614NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091257NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to estimate fertility trends in Brazil in the 2010s and early 2020s during a period of back-to-back novel infectious disease outbreaks - Zika virus and COVID-19. We use Brazilian Ministry of Health and Association of Civil Registrar data from 2011-2021 to measure general fertility rates at the national and state levels. We also used seasonal ARIMA model to forecast fertility rates by month and state in 2021 and compared these forecasts with observed fertility rates. We find that fertility rates were steady over 2011-2015 with no statistically significant variation, followed by a sharp decline during the Zika outbreak in 2016 followed by a return to pre-Zika levels after the end of the epidemic. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, we make comparisons with observed and forecast rates from 2020-2021, showing that declines were generally larger for observed than for forecast rates, yet statistically insignificant. We argue that the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 might lead to further declines, as women might have not had enough time to adjust rebound from either the effects of the Zika epidemic. We also discuss the importance of timely availability of live births data during a public health crisis with immediate consequences for fertility rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19Zika VirusZika Virus InfectionBrazilDisease OutbreaksFemaleFertilityHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35508025
PMCPMC9744098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.