Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507923›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2022

Impact of COVID-19 Social Distancing Mandates on Gastrointestinal Pathogen Positivity: Secondary Data Analysis.

Tanner Palmer, L Scott Benson, Christina Porucznik, Lisa H Gren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contributing Factors of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks - National Outbreak Reporting System, United States, 2014-2022.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2025
    Article
  4. [Epidemiological characteristics in gastroenteritis diagnosis before and during the pandemic].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanner PalmerDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4327-1436
L Scott BensonDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-9434
Christina PorucznikDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-2917
Lisa H GrenDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5868-3292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute gastrointestinal (GI) illnesses are of the most common problems evaluated by physicians and some of the most preventable. There is evidence of GI pathogen transmission when people are in close contact. The COVID-19 pandemic led to the sudden implementation of widespread social distancing measures in the United States. There is strong evidence that social distancing measures impact the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and a growing body of research indicates that these measures also decrease the transmission of other respiratory pathogens.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the impact of COVID-19 social distancing mandates on the GI pathogen positivity rates.

methodsDeidentified GI Panel polymerase chain reaction test results from a routinely collected diagnostic database from January 1, 2019, through August 31, 2020, were analyzed for the GI pathogen positivity percentage. An interrupted time series analysis was performed, using social distancing mandate issue dates as the intervention date. The following 3 target organisms were chosen for the final analysis to represent different primary transmission routes: adenovirus F40 and 41, norovirus GI and GII, and Escherichia coli O157.

resultsIn total, 84,223 test results from 9 states were included in the final data set. With the exception of E coli O157 in Kansas, Michigan, and Nebraska, we observed an immediate decrease in positivity percentage during the week of social distancing mandates for all other targets and states. Norovirus GI and GII showed the most notable drop in positivity, whereas E coli O157 appeared to be least impacted by social distancing mandates. Although we acknowledge the analysis has a multiple testing problem, the majority of our significant results showed significance even below the .01 level.

conclusionsThis study aimed to investigate the impact of social distancing mandates for COVID-19 on GI pathogen positivity, and we discovered that social distancing measures in fact decreased GI pathogen positivity initially. The use of similar measures may prove useful in GI pathogen outbreaks. The use of a unique diagnostic database in this study exhibits the potential for its use as a public health surveillance tool.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data AnalysisEscherichia coliHumansPandemicsPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19diagnostic databaseepidemiologygastroenteritisgastrointestinaloutbreakpathogen outbreakpathogen transmissionpublic healthrespiratory pathogensocial distancingsurveillancesurveillance tool

Identifiers

PMID35507923
PMCPMC9407155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.