Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507919›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2022

Immunologic Features in De Novo and Recurrent Glioblastoma Are Associated with Survival Outcomes.

Cécile Alanio, Zev A Binder, Renee B Chang, MacLean P Nasrallah, Devora Delman, Joey H Li, Oliver Y Tang, Logan Y Zhang, Jiasi Vicky Zhang, E John Wherry and 2 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cécile Alanio *INSERM U932, PSL University, Institut Curie, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-7445
Zev A Binder *Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1158-231X
Renee B Chang *Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-7005
MacLean P Nasrallah *Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-0898
Devora DelmanGlioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-6705
Joey H LiAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-5876
Oliver Y TangGlioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-2708
Logan Y ZhangGlioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-6510
Jiasi Vicky ZhangGlioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4318-3754
E John Wherry *Institute for Immunology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0477-1956
Donald M O'Rourke *Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-7314
Gregory L Beatty *Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7165-5993

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Virology CoreU19AI082630 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG, GEORG Michael LAUER · 2009 to 2026
$48.1M
Synergies among inhibitory receptors in tolerance, cancer & antiviral immunityP01AI108545 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Dario AA Vignali · 2015 to 2026
$30.8M
Modeling HIV CAR-T cell trafficking and persistence in Non-Human PrimatesU19AI149680 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RILEY, JAMES L. · 2020 to 2024
$13.2M
Radiation and checkpoint blockade for cancer immune therapyP01CA210944 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAITY, AMIT, MINN, ANDY J · 2017 to 2022
$11.5M
Targeting the liver for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancerR01CA197916 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Gregory L Beatty · 2016 to 2026
$3.7M
Temporal control of differentiation and epigenetics of Exhausted CD8 T cells by ToxR01AI155577 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WHERRY, E. JOHN · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA210944NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197916NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI108545NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155577NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082630NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI149680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an immunologically "cold" tumor characterized by poor responsiveness to immunotherapy. Standard of care for GBM is surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy. However, tumor recurrence is the norm, and recurring tumors are found frequently to have acquired molecular changes (e.g., mutations) that may influence their immunobiology. Here, we compared the immune contexture of de novo GBM and recurrent GBM (rGBM) using high-dimensional cytometry and multiplex IHC. Although myeloid and T cells were similarly abundant in de novo and rGBM, their spatial organization within tumors differed and was linked to outcomes. In rGBM, T cells were enriched and activated in perivascular regions and clustered with activated macrophages and fewer regulatory T cells. Moreover, a higher expression of phosphorylated STAT1 by T cells in these regions at recurrence was associated with a favorable prognosis. Together, our data identify differences in the immunobiology of de novo GBM and rGBM and identify perivascular T cells as potential therapeutic targets. See related Spotlight by Bayik et al., p. 787.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35507919
PMCPMC9250610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.