ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
The distal C terminus of the dihydropyridine receptor β
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactive Role of the DHPR βBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Effects of aging on calcium channels in skeletal muscle.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Sarcoplasmic Reticulum CaCells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β1a subunit is indispensable for full trafficking of DHPRs into triadic junctions (i.e., the close apposition of transverse tubules and sarcoplasmic reticulum [SR]), facilitation of DHPRα1S voltage sensing, and arrangement of DHPRs into tetrads as a consequence of their interaction with ryanodine receptor (RyR1) homotetramers. These three features are obligatory for skeletal muscle excitation–contraction (EC) coupling. Previously, we showed that all four vertebrate β isoforms (β1–β4) facilitate α1S triad targeting and, except for β3, fully enable DHPRα1S voltage sensing [Dayal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7488–7493 (2013)]. Consequently, β3 failed to restore EC coupling despite the fact that both β3 and β1a restore tetrads. Thus, all β-subunits are able to restore triad targeting, but only β1a restores both tetrads and proper DHPR–RyR1 coupling [Dayal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7488–7493 (2013)]. To investigate the molecular region(s) of β1a responsible for the tetradic arrangement of DHPRs and thus DHPR–RyR1 coupling, we expressed loss- and gain-of-function chimeras between β1a and β4, with systematically swapped domains in zebrafish strain relaxed (β1-null) for patch clamp, cytoplasmic Ca2+ transients, motility, and freeze-fracture electron microscopy. β1a/β4 chimeras with either N terminus, SH3, HOOK, or GK domain derived from β4 showed complete restoration of SR Ca2+ release. However, chimera β1a/β4(C) with β4 C terminus produced significantly reduced cytoplasmic Ca2+ transients. Conversely, gain-of-function chimera β4/β1a(C) with β1a C terminus completely restored cytoplasmic Ca2+ transients, DHPR tetrads, and motility. Furthermore, we found that the nonconserved, distal C terminus of β1a plays a pivotal role in reconstitution of DHPR tetrads and thus allosteric DHPR–RyR1 interaction, essential for skeletal muscle EC coupling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.