Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507836›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses

Access, Utilization, and Implementation of Research Among Rehabilitation Nurses: A Qualitative Study.

Jessica Pope Mitro, J Mary Louise Pomeroy, Sarah Osman, Virina Matta, Cindy Cai, Steven Garfinkel, Ali A Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica Pope MitroSchool of Kinesiology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
J Mary Louise PomeroyDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Sarah OsmanDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Virina MattaDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Cindy CaiAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Steven GarfinkelAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Ali A WeinsteinDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to understand rehabilitation nurses' perceptions of research information, related barriers, and avenues for future research, specifically in those caring for individuals with burn injury, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury.

designQualitative semistructured interviews were conducted.

methodsEighteen interviews were conducted. A thematic network approach identified codes and developed basic, organizing, and global themes.

resultsResearchers identified factors that facilitated research uptake, determined organizational structures that support research culture, and described nurse engagement with literature.

conclusionsAlthough participants desired to engage with the research literature, they identified barriers including time constraints, heavy workloads, and lack of access. To facilitate research uptake, research must be easily accessible, be easily digestible, and include clinical practice recommendations. Research must expand its scope to address issues relevant to the rehabilitation population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings may be used to drive improvements in research competence, facilitate knowledge translation, and support evidence-based practice among rehabilitation nurses.

Indexed as

NursesHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35507836
PMCPMC9060933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.