Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507396›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Impact of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Support System for Urinary Tract Infections: Prospective Observational Study in 36 Primary Care Practices.

Willem Ernst Herter, Janine Khuc, Giovanni Cinà, Bart J Knottnerus, Mattijs E Numans, Maryse A Wiewel, Tobias N Bonten, Daan P de Bruin, Thamar van Esch, Niels H Chavannes and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04408976 (Implementation Study With Machine Learning Based Decision Support Software for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04408976 completednot on this map

Implementation Study With Machine Learning Based Decision Support Software for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in General Practice.

TypeobservationalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled16,824ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Willem Ernst HerterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9189-6839
Janine KhucPacmed, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-0254
Giovanni CinàPacmed, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3521-8208
Bart J KnottnerusNivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-1746
Mattijs E NumansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-5426
Maryse A WiewelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-5944
Tobias N BontenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-6182
Daan P de BruinPacmed, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-0910
Thamar van EschNivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-0404
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8607-9199
Robert A VerheijNivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2234-4819
Leiden University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing attention on machine learning (ML)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS), but their added value and pitfalls are very rarely evaluated in clinical practice. We implemented a CDSS to aid general practitioners (GPs) in treating patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are a significant health burden worldwide.

objectiveThis study aims to prospectively assess the impact of this CDSS on treatment success and change in antibiotic prescription behavior of the physician. In doing so, we hope to identify drivers and obstacles that positively impact the quality of health care practice with ML.

methodsThe CDSS was developed by Pacmed, Nivel, and Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). The CDSS presents the expected outcomes of treatments, using interpretable decision trees as ML classifiers. Treatment success was defined as a subsequent period of 28 days during which no new antibiotic treatment for UTI was needed. In this prospective observational study, 36 primary care practices used the software for 4 months. Furthermore, 29 control practices were identified using propensity score-matching. All analyses were performed using electronic health records from the Nivel Primary Care Database. Patients for whom the software was used were identified in the Nivel database by sequential matching using CDSS use data. We compared the proportion of successful treatments before and during the study within the treatment arm. The same analysis was performed for the control practices and the patient subgroup the software was definitely used for. All analyses, including that of physicians' prescription behavior, were statistically tested using 2-sided z tests with an α level of .05.

resultsIn the treatment practices, 4998 observations were included before and 3422 observations (of 2423 unique patients) were included during the implementation period. In the control practices, 5044 observations were included before and 3360 observations were included during the implementation period. The proportion of successful treatments increased significantly from 75% to 80% in treatment practices (z=5.47, P<.001). No significant difference was detected in control practices (76% before and 76% during the pilot, z=0.02; P=.98). Of the 2423 patients, we identified 734 (30.29%) in the CDSS use database in the Nivel database. For these patients, the proportion of successful treatments during the study was 83%-a statistically significant difference, with 75% of successful treatments before the study in the treatment practices (z=4.95; P<.001).

conclusionsThe introduction of the CDSS as an intervention in the 36 treatment practices was associated with a statistically significant improvement in treatment success. We excluded temporal effects and validated the results with the subgroup analysis in patients for whom we were certain that the software was used. This study shows important strengths and points of attention for the development and implementation of an ML-based CDSS in clinical practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04408976; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04408976.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision support systemimplementation studyinformation technologymachine learningMLurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID35507396
PMCPMC9118012
OpenAlexW4213306591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.