Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507390›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Clustering Diagnoses From 58 Million Patient Visits in Finland Between 2015 and 2018.

Pasi Fränti, Sami Sieranoja, Katja Wikström, Tiina Laatikainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pasi FräntiMachine Learning Group, School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-2827
Sami SieranojaMachine Learning Group, School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9110-2421
Katja WikströmInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-2875
Tiina LaatikainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-4782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple chronic diseases in patients are a major burden on the health service system. Currently, diseases are mostly treated separately without paying sufficient attention to their relationships, which results in the fragmentation of the care process. The better integration of services can lead to the more effective organization of the overall health care system.

objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the connections between diseases based on their co-occurrences to support decision-makers in better organizing health care services.

methodsWe performed a cluster analysis of diagnoses by using data from the Finnish Health Care Registers for primary and specialized health care visits and inpatient care. The target population of this study comprised those 3.8 million individuals (3,835,531/5,487,308, 69.90% of the whole population) aged ≥18 years who used health care services from the years 2015 to 2018. They had a total of 58 million visits. Clustering was performed based on the co-occurrence of diagnoses. The more the same pair of diagnoses appeared in the records of the same patients, the more the diagnoses correlated with each other. On the basis of the co-occurrences, we calculated the relative risk of each pair of diagnoses and clustered the data by using a graph-based clustering algorithm called the M-algorithm-a variant of k-means.

resultsThe results revealed multimorbidity clusters, of which some were expected (eg, one representing hypertensive and cardiovascular diseases). Other clusters were more unexpected, such as the cluster containing lower respiratory tract diseases and systemic connective tissue disorders. The annual cost of all clusters was €10.0 billion, and the costliest cluster was cardiovascular and metabolic problems, costing €2.3 billion.

conclusionsThe method and the achieved results provide new insights into identifying key multimorbidity groups, especially those resulting in burden and costs in health care services.

Indexed as

big dataclustercluster analysiscomorbiditydata analysisdisease co-occurrenceEuropeFinlandgraph clusteringhealth care data analysishealth recordk-meansmachine learningmultimorbiditymultimorbidity networkregister

Identifiers

PMID35507390
PMCPMC9118010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.