ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022
Open Force Field Evaluator: An Automated, Efficient, and Scalable Framework for the Estimation of Physical Properties from Molecular Simulation.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training a force field for proteins and small molecules from scratch.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Developing and Benchmarking Sage 2.3.0 with the AshGC Neural Network Charge Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Speed up Multi-Scale Force-Field Parameter Optimization by Substituting Molecular Dynamics Calculations with a Machine Learning Surrogate Model.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Article
- GOPAL: A Water Model with Improved Thermodynamic Properties over a Large Pressure and Temperature Range Optimized Using Multistate Reweighting and Configuration Space Mapping.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Reversible molecular simulation for training classical and machine-learning force fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Machine-learned molecular mechanics force fields from large-scale quantum chemical data.Chemical science · 2024Article
- The Open Force Field Initiative: Open Software and Open Science for Molecular Modeling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Pathways to a Shiny Future: Building the Foundation for Computational Physical Chemistry and Biophysics in 2050.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2024Review
- A Fast, Convenient, Polarizable Electrostatic Model for Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- DASH: Dynamic Attention-Based Substructure Hierarchy for Partial Charge Assignment.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- A transferable double exponential potential for condensed phase simulations of small molecules.Digital discovery · 2023Article
- Development and Benchmarking of Open Force Field 2.0.0: The Sage Small Molecule Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Using physical property surrogate models to perform accelerated multi-fidelity optimization of force field parameters.Digital discovery · 2023Article
- Improving Force Field Accuracy by Training against Condensed-Phase Mixture Properties.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing accurate classical force field representations of molecules is key to realizing the full potential of molecular simulations, both as a powerful route to gaining fundamental insights into a broad spectrum of chemical and biological phenomena and for predicting physicochemical and mechanical properties of substances. The Open Force Field Consortium is an industry-funded open science effort to this end, developing open-source tools for rapidly generating new high-quality small-molecule force fields. An integral aspect of this is the parameterization and assessment of force fields against high-quality, condensed-phase physical property data, curated from open data sources such as the NIST ThermoML Archive, alongside quantum chemical data. The quantity of such experimental data in open data archives alone would require an onerous amount of human and computational resources to both curate and estimate manually, especially when estimations must be obtained for numerous sets of force field parameters. Here, we present an entirely automated, highly scalable framework for evaluating physical properties and their gradients in terms of force field parameters. It is written as a modular and extensible Python framework, which employs an intelligent multiscale estimation approach that allows for the automated estimation of properties from simulation and cached simulation data, and a pluggable API for estimation of new properties. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of the framework by benchmarking the OpenFF 1.0.0 small-molecule force field and GAFF 1.8 and GAFF 2.1 force fields against a test set of binary density and enthalpy of mixing measurements curated using the framework utilities. Further, we demonstrate the framework's utility as part of force field optimization by using it alongside ForceBalance, a framework for systematic force field optimization, to retrain a set of nonbonded van der Waals parameters against a training set of density and enthalpy of vaporization measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.