Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507269›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Optimizing the Parametrization of Homologue Classification in the Pan-Genome Computation for a Bacterial Species: Case Study Streptococcus pyogenes.

Erwin Tantoso, Birgit Eisenhaber, Frank Eisenhaber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erwin TantosoBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Birgit EisenhaberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Frank EisenhaberGenome Institute and Bioinformatics Institute, Singapore, Singapore. franke@bii.a-star.edu.sg.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGBioinformatics Institute · SGGenome Institute of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigm shift associated with the introduction of the pan-genome concept has drawn the attention from singular reference genomes toward the actual sequence diversity within organism populations, strain collections, clades, etc. A single genome is no longer sufficient to describe bacteria of interest, but instead, the genomic repertoire of all existing strains is the key to the metabolic, evolutionary, or pathogenic potential of a species. The classification of orthologous genes derived from a collection of taxonomically related genome sequences is central to bacterial pan-genome computational analysis. In this work, we present a review of methods for computing pan-genome gene clusters including their comparative analysis for the case of Streptococcus pyogenes strain genomes. We exhaustively scanned the parametrization space of the homologue searching procedures and find optimal parameters (sequence identity (60%) and coverage (50-60%) in the pairwise alignment) for the orthologous clustering of gene sequences. We find that the sequence identity threshold influences the number of gene families ~3 times stronger than the sequence coverage threshold.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialStreptococcus pyogenesCluster AnalysisGenomicsMultigene FamilyPhylogenyBacterial genomeCore genomeOrthologuePan-genomeParalogue

Identifiers

PMID35507269
OpenAlexW4285291016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.