ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Dissecting the Genome for Drug Response Prediction.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances and challenges in colorectal cancer: From molecular research to treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Optimized models and deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer treatments: a review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Golden eagle optimized CONV-LSTM and non-negativity-constrained autoencoder to support spatial and temporal features in cancer drug response prediction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Trends and Potential of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Drug Study at Single-Cell Level.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of the cancer cell lines sensitivity to a specific treatment is one of the current challenges in precision medicine. With omics and pharmacogenomics data being available for over 1000 cancer cell lines, several machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been proposed for drug sensitivity prediction. However, deciding which omics data to use and which computational methods can efficiently incorporate data from different sources is the challenge which several research groups are working on. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the representative computational methods that have been developed in the last 2 years on three public datasets: COSMIC, CCLE, NCI-60. These methods aim to improve the prediction of the cancer cell lines sensitivity to a given treatment by incorporating drug's chemical information in the input or using a priori feature selection. Finally, we discuss the latest published method which aims to improve the prediction of clinical drug response of real patients starting from cancer cell line molecular profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35507263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.