Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507131›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2022

Three-dimensional (3D) liver cell models - a tool for bridging the gap between animal studies and clinical trials when screening liver accumulation and toxicity of nanobiomaterials.

Melissa Anne Tutty, Dania Movia, Adriele Prina-Mello

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Xeno-Free 3D Bioprinted Liver Model for Hepatotoxicity Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa Anne TuttyNanomedicine and Molecular Imaging Group, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland. tuttym@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-6705-2492
Dania MoviaNanomedicine and Molecular Imaging Group, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Adriele Prina-MelloNanomedicine and Molecular Imaging Group, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland. prinamea@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-4371-2214
Trinity College Dublin · IETrinity College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the exciting properties and wide-reaching applications of nanobiomaterials (NBMs) in human health and medicine, their translation from bench to bedside is slow, with a predominant issue being liver accumulation and toxicity following systemic administration. In vitro 2D cell-based assays and in vivo testing are the most popular and widely used methods for assessing liver toxicity at pre-clinical stages; however, these fall short in predicting toxicity for NBMs. Focusing on in vitro and in vivo assessment, the accurate prediction of human-specific hepatotoxicity is still a significant challenge to researchers. This review describes the relationship between NBMs and the liver, and the methods for assessing toxicity, focusing on the limitations they bring in the assessment of NBM hepatotoxicity as one of the reasons defining the poor translation for NBMs. We will then present some of the most recent advances towards the development of more biologically relevant in vitro liver methods based on tissue-mimetic 3D cell models and how these could facilitate the translation of NBMs going forward. Finally, we also discuss the low public acceptance and limited uptake of tissue-mimetic 3D models in pre-clinical assessment, despite the demonstrated technical and ethical advantages associated with them. 3D culture models for use as in vitro alternatives to traditional methods and conventional in vivo animal testing for testing liver accumulation and toxicity of nanobiomaterials.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAnimalsHepatocytesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiver3D modelsHepatotoxicityLiverNanobiomaterialsNanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID35507131
PMCPMC9066991
OpenAlexW4229053081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.