ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Efficient analysis of COVID-19 clinical data using machine learning models.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven prediction of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting the functional outcome of patients with proximal femur fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid model integrating RoBERTa, TF-IDF, and attention mechanism for medical query intent classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Alteration of circulating ACE2-network related microRNAs in patients with COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Efficient clinical data analysis for prediction of coal workers' pneumoconiosis using machine learning algorithms.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Comprehensive analysis of clinical data for COVID-19 outcome estimation with machine learning models.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Article
- PWM2Vec: An Efficient Embedding Approach for Viral Host Specification from Coronavirus Spike Sequences.Biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of the rapid spread of COVID-19 to almost every part of the globe, huge volumes of data and case studies have been made available, providing researchers with a unique opportunity to find trends and make discoveries like never before by leveraging such big data. This data is of many different varieties and can be of different levels of veracity, e.g., precise, imprecise, uncertain, and missing, making it challenging to extract meaningful information from such data. Yet, efficient analyses of this continuously growing and evolving COVID-19 data is crucial to inform - often in real-time - the relevant measures needed for controlling, mitigating, and ultimately avoiding viral spread. Applying machine learning-based algorithms to this big data is a natural approach to take to this aim since they can quickly scale to such data and extract the relevant information in the presence of variety and different levels of veracity. This is important for COVID-19 and potential future pandemics in general. In this paper, we design a straightforward encoding of clinical data (on categorical attributes) into a fixed-length feature vector representation and then propose a model that first performs efficient feature selection from such representation. We apply this approach to two clinical datasets of the COVID-19 patients and then apply different machine learning algorithms downstream for classification purposes. We show that with the efficient feature selection algorithm, we can achieve a prediction accuracy of more than 90% in most cases. We also computed the importance of different attributes in the dataset using information gain. This can help the policymakers focus on only certain attributes to study this disease rather than focusing on multiple random factors that may not be very informative to patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.