Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507102›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2022

Inability of ovarian cancers to upregulate their MHC-class I surface expression marks their aggressiveness and increased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Nishant Chovatiya, Kawaljit Kaur, Sara Huerta-Yepez, Po-Chun Chen, Adam Neal, Gabriella DiBernardo, Serhat Gumrukcu, Sanaz Memarzadeh, Anahid Jewett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Breaking Immunosuppression to Enhance Cancer Stem Cell-Targeted Immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nishant Chovatiya *Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, University of California School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Kawaljit Kaur *Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, University of California School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Sara Huerta-Yepez *Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, University of California School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Po-Chun Chen *Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, University of California School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Adam NealDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 610 Charles E Young Drive East, 3018 Terasaki Life Sciences Building, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Gabriella DiBernardoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 610 Charles E Young Drive East, 3018 Terasaki Life Sciences Building, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Serhat GumrukcuSeraph Research Institute, 4142 Lankershim Blvd, Toluca Lake, CA, 91602, USA.
Sanaz MemarzadehThe Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA School of Dentistry and Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. smemarzadeh@mednet.ucla.edu.
Anahid JewettDivision of Oral Biology and Medicine, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, University of California School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, 90095, USA. ajewett@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-1176
University of California, Los Angeles · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We extended our previous observations with other tumor models to study seven ovarian tumor cell lines-OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR8, SKOV3, Kuramochi, OAW28, and CaOV3. We found that NK cells targeted and killed poorly differentiated OVCAR8 and CAOV3; these two tumor lines express lower MHC-class I and higher CD44 surface receptors. OVCAR3 and OVCAR4 were more resistant to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and SKOV3, Kuramochi and OAW28 had intermediate sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, likely representing well-differentiated and moderately differentiated ovarian tumor cell lines, respectively. Similar trends were observed for secretion of IFN-γ by the NK cells when co-cultured with different ovarian tumor cell lines. Treatment with both IFN-γ and TNF-α upregulated MHC-class I in all ovarian tumor cell lines and resulted in tumor resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and decreased secretion of IFN-γ in co-cultures of NK cells with tumors cells with the exception of OVCAR8 and CAOV3 which did not upregulate MHC-class I and remained sensitive to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and increased secretion of IFN-γ when co-cultured with NK cells. Similarly, treatment with NK cell supernatants induced resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in OVCAR4 but not in OVCAR8, and the resistance to killing was correlated with the increased surface expression of MHC-class I in OVCAR4 but not in OVCAR8. In addition, OVCAR4 was found to be carboplatin sensitive before and after treatment with IFN-γ and NK cell supernatants, whereas OVCAR8 remained carboplatin resistant with and without treatment with IFN-γ and NK cell supernatants. Overall, sensitivity to NK cell-mediated killing correlated with the levels of tumor differentiation and aggressiveness, and more importantly, poorly differentiated ovarian tumors were unable to upregulate MHC-class I under the activating conditions for MHC-class I, a feature that was not seen in other tumor models and may likely be specific to ovarian tumors. Such tumors may also pose a significant challenge in elimination by the T cells; however, NK cells are capable of targeting such tumors and can be exploited to eliminate these tumors in immunotherapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaApoptosisCarboplatinCell Line, TumorCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansKiller Cells, NaturalCarboplatinHistocompatibility Antigens Class ITumor Necrosis Factor-alphaChemotherapeutic drugsCytotoxicityDifferentiationIFN-γOvarian cancerTNF-α

Identifiers

PMID35507102
PMCPMC10991924
OpenAlexW4225379895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.