ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Early endoscopic injection may prevent new scarring in idiopathic detrusor overactivity disorder with vesicoureteral reflux in children.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo present baseline characteristics and the long-term treatment results of three groups of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDOD) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) according to different treatment regimens, which underwent endoscopic subureteric injection (STING) in the early phase of targeted treatment (TT) (ES group), underwent STING in the late phase of TT (LS group) and with TT only (TT group). PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 49 IDOD cases with VUR which were divided into three groups according to treatment regimens were evaluated in terms of age, symptoms, bladder capacities, involuntary contraction pressures (ICP), presence and degree of renal scar, differential renal functions (DF), new scar formation and STING success.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, side, symptoms, presence of urinary tract infection (UTI), DF, ICP and bladder capacity at diagnosis. A high grade of reflux was found to be significantly lower in the TT group (p = 0.037). There was no significant difference in terms of ICP, DF, bladder capacity and reflux grade between ES and LS Group. But new scar formation was more in LS Group (p = 0.003).
conclusionThe STING success is satisfactory in IDOD cases with VUR, waiting a long period of time for diminishing symptoms may cost new scar formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.