Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507050›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice.

Roberto Lo Gullo, Varadan Sevilimedu, Pascal Baltzer, Denis Le Bihan, Julia Camps-Herrero, Paola Clauser, Fiona J Gilbert, Mami Iima, Ritse M Mann, Savannah C Partridge and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Roberto Lo GulloDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Varadan SevilimeduDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, NY, New York, 10017, USA.
Pascal BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
Denis Le BihanNeuroSpin/Joliot, CEA-Saclay Center, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Julia Camps-HerreroRibera Salud Hospitals, Valencia, Spain.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Wien, Austria.
Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Mami IimaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Savannah C PartridgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew PattersonDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Eric E SigmundDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 6, 60 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Sunitha ThakurDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Fabienne E ThibaultDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France.
Laura Martincich *Unit of Radiodiagnostics, Ospedale Cardinal G. Massaia -ASL AT, Via Conte Verde 125, 14100, Asti, Italy.
Katja Pinker *Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA. pinkerdk@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-7331
EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Validation and Standardization of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Breast CancerR01CA207290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2017 to 2022
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207290NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo perform a survey among all European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather representative data regarding the clinical use of breast DWI.

methodsAn online questionnaire was developed by two board-certified radiologists, reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees, and finally distributed among EUSOBI active and associated (not based in Europe) radiologist members. The questionnaire included 20 questions pertaining to technical preferences (acquisition time, magnet strength, breast coils, number of b values), clinical indications, imaging evaluation, and reporting. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test of independence, and Fisher's exact test.

resultsOf 1411 EUSOBI radiologist members, 275/1411 (19.5%) responded. Most (222/275, 81%) reported using DWI as part of their routine protocol. Common indications for DWI include lesion characterization (using an ADC threshold of 1.2-1.3 × 10

conclusionThe utilization of DWI in clinical practice among EUSOBI radiologists who responded to the survey is generally in line with international recommendations, with the main application being the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing lesions, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is not uniform. KEY POINTS: • Clinical performance of breast DWI is in good agreement with the current recommendations of the EUSOBI International Breast DWI working group. • Breast DWI applications in clinical practice include the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. • Report integration of DWI results is not uniform.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesBreast neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35507050
PMCPMC9064723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.