Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35507014›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Clinton Yam, Nour Abuhadra, Ryan Sun, Beatriz E Adrada, Qing-Qing Ding, Jason B White, Elizabeth E Ravenberg, Alyson R Clayborn, Vicente Valero, Debu Tripathy and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02276443 (ARTEMIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02276443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

ARTEMIS: A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2026Enrolled798ConditionsInvasive Breast Carcinoma, Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v7ArmsChemotherapy, Immunotherapy, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Lymph Node Biopsy, Ultrasonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Histone acetylation modulators in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Clinton Yam *Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Nour Abuhadra *Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ryan Sun *Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Beatriz E AdradaDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Qing-Qing DingDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jason B WhiteDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-545X
Elizabeth E RavenbergDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alyson R ClaybornDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Senthilkumar DamodaranDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Banu K ArunDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8390-4985
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0166-7275
Rashmi K MurthyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-4718
Bora LimDepartment of Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-6058
Luis BaezPROncology (Private Practice), University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Xiaoxian LiDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute - Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aman U BuzdarDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-3178
Gabriel N HortobagyiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-4412
Alistair M ThompsonSection of Breast Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gaiane M RauchDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2079-5202
Rosalind P CandelariaDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-7896
Lei HuoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stacy L MoulderDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jeffrey T ChangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4578-5636
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USChildren's Cancer Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PR

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 2: Targeting Cooperative Phenotypes Common in Spatial HeterogeneityU54CA209978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BILD, ANDREA HOPE · 2017 to 2021
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer that is commonly triple-negative and poorly responsive to neoadjuvant therapy in retrospective studies. EXPERIMENTAL

designTo better define clinical outcomes and correlates of response, we analyzed the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy, survival outcomes, and genomic and transcriptomic profiles of the pretreatment tumors in a prospective clinical trial (NCT02276443). A total of 211 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including 39 with MpBC, received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-based neoadjuvant therapy.

resultsAlthough not meeting the threshold for statistical significance, patients with MpBCs were less likely to experience a pCR (23% vs. 40%; P = 0.07), had shorter event-free survival (29.4 vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.15), metastasis-free survival (30.3 vs. 32.4 months, P = 0.22); and overall survival (32.6 vs. 34.3 months, P = 0.21). This heterogeneity is mirrored in the molecular profiling. Mutations in PI3KCA (23% vs. 9%, P = 0.07) and its pathway (41% vs. 18%, P = 0.02) were frequently observed and enriched in MpBCs. The gene expression profiles of each histologically defined subtype were distinguishable and characterized by distinctive gene signatures. Among nonmetaplastic (non-Mp) TNBCs, 10% possessed a metaplastic-like gene expression signature and had pCR rates and survival outcomes similar to MpBC.

conclusionsFurther investigations will determine if metaplastic-like tumors should be treated more similarly to MpBC in the clinic. The 23% pCR rate in this study suggests that patients with MpBC should be considered for NAT. To improve this rate, a pathway analysis predicted enrichment of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and RTK/MAPK pathways in MpBC, which may serve as new targetable vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMetaplasiaNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35507014
PMCPMC9250637
OpenAlexW4225422652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.