Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506662›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Intrinsic excitability mechanisms of neuronal ensemble formation.

Tzitzitlini Alejandre-García, Samuel Kim, Jesús Pérez-Ortega, Rafael Yuste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Engrams and Memory: My Scientific "Eras Tour".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tzitzitlini Alejandre-GarcíaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2243-8703
Samuel KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Jesús Pérez-OrtegaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8502-1692
Rafael YusteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-497X
Columbia University · US

Funding

IMAGING FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY IN VISUAL CORTEXR01EY011787 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI YUSTE, RAFAEL · 1998 to 2021
$6.4M
Effect of GABAergic inhibition of dendritic spines on synaptic pruning in the medial prefrontal cortex during adolescenceR01MH115900 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHERYL S · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011787NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal ensembles are coactive groups of cortical neurons, found in spontaneous and evoked activity, that can mediate perception and behavior. To understand the mechanisms that lead to the formation of ensembles, we co-activated layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in brain slices from mouse visual cortex, in animals of both sexes, replicating in vitro an optogenetic protocol to generate ensembles in vivo. Using whole-cell and perforated patch-clamp pair recordings we found that, after optogenetic or electrical stimulation, coactivated neurons increased their correlated activity, a hallmark of ensemble formation. Coactivated neurons showed small biphasic changes in presynaptic plasticity, with an initial depression followed by a potentiation after a recovery period. Optogenetic and electrical stimulation also induced significant increases in frequency and amplitude of spontaneous EPSPs, even after single-cell stimulation. In addition, we observed unexpected strong and persistent increases in neuronal excitability after stimulation, with increases in membrane resistance and reductions in spike threshold. A pharmacological agent that blocks changes in membrane resistance reverted this effect. These significant increases in excitability can explain the observed biphasic synaptic plasticity. We conclude that cell-intrinsic changes in excitability are involved in the formation of neuronal ensembles. We propose an 'iceberg' model, by which increased neuronal excitability makes subthreshold connections suprathreshold, enhancing the effect of already existing synapses, and generating a new neuronal ensemble.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityVisual CortexAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceNeuronsPyramidal CellsSynapsescell biologyensemblesHebbian plasticityintrinsic excitabilitymouseneuroscienceoptogeneticssynaptic connectionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID35506662
PMCPMC9197391
OpenAlexW4225371903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.