ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Bias field correction in hyperpolarized
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Focal-DenseNet: A Risk Assessment Framework for Alzheimer's Disease in Heterogeneous MRI Data.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Comparing Mean-anchored Generalized Linear Binning with Established Methods to Quantify Xenon-129 Ventilation Defect Percentage.Academic radiology · 2026Article
- Quantifying gravity-dependent and gravity-independent ventilation distribution by hyperpolarizedFrontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Establishing standardized healthy reference distributions and values for multisiteMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Optimizing Xenon 129 Ventilation MRI in Cystic Fibrosis with Spiral Imaging and Flip-Angle Correction.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an integrated variable flip angle protocol to estimate coil BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Analytical corrections for BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Current methods for hyperpolarized [1-Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Review
- Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (HyperCEST) Molecular Imaging: Achievements and Future Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Functional gas exchange measures onFrontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Hyperpolarized [2-NeuroImage · 2023Article
- BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- HyperpolarizedAcademic radiology · 2022Article
- HyperpolarizedRespiratory medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo correct for RF inhomogeneity for in vivo
methodsRF-depolarization mapping was evaluated first in digital simulations and then in 51 subjects who had undergone radial
resultsRF-depolarization and template-based mapping methods yielded a pattern of RF-inhomogeneity consistent with the expected variation based on coil architecture. The resulting corrected images were visually similar, but meaningfully distinct from those generated using standard N4ITK correction. The N4ITK algorithm eliminated the physiologically expected anterior-posterior gradient (-0.04 ± 1.56%/cm, P < 0.001). These 2 newly introduced methods of RF-depolarization and template correction retained the physiologically expected anterior-posterior ventilation gradient in healthy subjects (2.77 ± 2.09%/cm and 2.01 ± 2.73%/cm, respectively).
conclusionsRandomized 3D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.