Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2022

Comparing learning retention in medical students using mixed-reality to supplement dissection: a preliminary study.

Guy Baratz, Preethy S Sridharan, Valeda Yong, Curtis Tatsuoka, Mark A Griswold, Susanne Wish-Baratz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07310160 (Development of a Digital Twin-Haptic Integrated Mixed Reality Simulation for Pressure Injury Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07310160 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Digital Twin-Haptic Integrated Mixed Reality Simulation for Pressure Injury Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorNEBAHAT BORA GÜNEŞRan2026 to 2026Enrolled130ConditionsPressure Injury, Simulation Based Learning, NursingArmsDigital Twin-Haptic Integrated Simulation, High-Fidelity Simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Using Hologram-Based Augmented Reality in Anatomy Learning: The TEACHANATOMY Randomized Trial.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Applications and Challenges of Virtual Reality in Medical Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guy BaratzSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Preethy S SridharanDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Valeda YongDepartment of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Curtis TatsuokaDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland OH, USA.
Mark A GriswoldDepartment of Radiology, Interactive Commons, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Susanne Wish-BaratzDepartment of Anatomy, HoloAnatomy, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USTel Aviv University · ILTemple University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate student impressions of learning anatomy with mixed-reality and compare long-term information retention of female breast anatomy between students who learned with a mixed-reality supplement and their classmates who dissected cadavers. Methods: In Part 1, 38 first-year medical student volunteers, randomly divided into two groups, completed a mixed-reality module and cadaveric dissection on the female breast in a counterbalanced design. Participants also completed post-quizzes and surveys. Part 2 was a non-randomized controlled trial, 8-months after completing Part 1 and 6-months after a final exam on this content. The performance of twenty-two Part 1 participants and 129 of their classmates, who only dissected, was compared on a delayed post-quiz. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze the data. Results: In Part 1, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined that participants expressed significantly more positive responses to mixed-reality and found mixed-reality easier for learning and teamwork. In Part 2, the Mann-Whitney U test found mixed-reality participants scored significantly higher on a delayed-post quiz than their classmates who only dissected (U = 928, p < .009). Conclusions: This study suggests that medical students may prefer mixed-reality and that it may be an effective modality for learning breast anatomy while facilitating teamwork. Results also suggest that supplementing cadaveric dissection with mixed-reality may improve long-term retention for at least one anatomical topic. It is recommended that similar studies evaluate a larger sample and additional anatomical regions to determine the generalizability of these findings.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCadaverCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearninganatomy educationknowledge retentionmedical educationmixed-reality

Identifiers

PMID35506483
PMCPMC9902173
OpenAlexW4225417595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.