Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506351›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Development and application of a pediatric mechanistic kidney model.

Farzaneh Salem, Ben G Small, Trevor N Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development and application of a pediatric mechanistic kidney model.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farzaneh SalemDrug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Ware, UK.
Ben G SmallSimcyp Division, Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-5689
Trevor N JohnsonSimcyp Division, Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0778-0081
Simcyp (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (P-PBPK) models have been used to predict age related changes in the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of renally cleared drugs mainly in relation to changes in glomerular filtration rate. With emerging data on ontogeny of renal transporters, mechanistic models of renal clearance accounting for the role of active and passive secretion should be developed and evaluated. Data on age-related physiological changes and ontogeny of renal transporters were applied into a mechanistic kidney within a P-PBPK model. Plasma concentration-time profile and PK parameters of cimetidine, ciprofloxacin, metformin, tenofovir, and zidovudine were predicted in subjects aged 1 day to 18 years. The predicted and observed plasma concentration-time profiles and PK parameters were compared. The predicted concentration-time profile means and 5th and 95th percent intervals generally captured the observed data and variability in various studies. Overall, based on drugs and age bands, predicted to observed clearance were all within two-fold and in 11 of 16 cases within 1.5-fold. Predicted to observed area under the curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C

Indexed as

KidneyModels, BiologicalArea Under CurveChildCiprofloxacinHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidney Function TestsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID35506351
PMCPMC9286721
OpenAlexW4225416981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.