Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506329›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2022

Acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination based on the protection motivation theory: A cross-sectional study in China.

Fan Wu, Yue Yuan, Zhaomin Deng, Di Yin, Qiufeng Shen, Jiehua Zeng, Yanhong Xie, Meifen Xu, Meiyi Yang, Shiqiang Jiang and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fan WuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yue YuanSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhaomin DengSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Di YinSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Qiufeng ShenHuadu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Jiehua ZengRecheng Community Health Service Station of Huadu District Huashan Town Health Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yanhong XieHuadu Vaccination Clinic of Tanbu Town Central Health Center, Guangzhou, China.
Meifen XuShiling Town Synthetic Community Health Service Center of Huadu District, Guangzhou, China.
Meiyi YangJianshebei Community Health Service Center of Huadu District, Guangzhou, China.
Shiqiang JiangNanshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Chunhuan ZhangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Huixi LuHuadu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Caijun SunSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNCommunity Health Center · USGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promotion of the booster shots against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is an open issue to be discussed. Little is known about the public intention and the influencing factors regarding the booster vaccine. A cross-sectional survey in Chinese adults was conducted using an online questionnaire, which designed on the basis of protection motivation theory (PMT) scale and vaccine hesitancy scale (VHS). Hierarchical multiple regression was used to compare the fitness of the PMT scale and VHS for predicting booster vaccination intention. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with the acceptance. Six thousand three hundred twenty-one (76.8%) of participants were willing to take the booster shot. However, the rest of the participants (23.2%) were still hesitant to take the booster vaccine. The PMT scale was more powerful than the VHS in explaining the vaccination intention. Participants with high perceived severity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69) and response cost (aOR = 0.47) were less willing to take the booster shots, but participants with high perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.19), response efficacy (aOR = 2.13), and self-efficacy (aOR = 3.33) were more willing to take the booster shots. In summary, interventions based on PMT can provide guidance to ensure the acceptance of the booster vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMotivationSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccinesbooster vaccineCOVID-19protection motivation theoryvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35506329
PMCPMC9348068
OpenAlexW4225372412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.