Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506237›Full record

ReviewBiology letters2022

Understanding the role of wild ruminants in anthelmintic resistance in livestock.

Tony L Brown, Paul M Airs, Siobhán Porter, Paul Caplat, Eric R Morgan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biotic interactions in soil and dung shape parasite transmission in temperate ruminant systems: An integrative framework.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Review
  11. Prevalence and geographical distribution of amphistomes of African wild ruminants: A scoping review.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tony L BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1411-9331
Paul M AirsSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Siobhán PorterVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, UK.
Paul CaplatSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Eric R MorganSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBAgri Food and Biosciences Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild ruminants are susceptible to infection from generalist helminth species, which can also infect domestic ruminants. A better understanding is required of the conditions under which wild ruminants can act as a source of helminths (including anthelmintic-resistant genotypes) for domestic ruminants, and vice versa, with the added possibility that wildlife could act as

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHaemonchusAnimalsDrug ResistanceLivestockRuminantsAnthelminticsdeerHaemonchus contortusnematodesrefugiatransmissiontrematodes

Identifiers

PMID35506237
PMCPMC9065971
OpenAlexW4225371362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.