ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2022
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy, Nondiabetic Young Children.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Glycogen Storage Diseases: A Systematic Review of Clinical Utility, Accuracy and Patient Outcomes.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of DTX401, an AAV8-Mediated Liver-Directed Gene Therapy, in Adults With Glycogen Storage Disease Type I a (GSDIa).Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Trial
- Carbohydrate composition of infant formula and glycemic regulation in early infancy using continuous glucose monitoring: cross-sectional evidence of altered glucose patterns with corn syrup solid-based formulas.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics Between Prediabetes and Normoglycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Review
- The Current Landscape for Screening and Monitoring of Early-Stage Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Review
- Utility of continuous glucose monitoring for identifying silent hypoglycemia in fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: a pilot prospective evaluation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring-New Diagnostic Tool in Complex Pathophysiological Disorder of Glucose Metabolism in Children and Adolescents with Obesity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Early Dysglycemia Is Detectable Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Very Young Children at Risk of Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Enterally Fed Children with Severe Central Nervous System Impairment.Nutrients · 2023Observational
- Continuous glucose monitoring for children with hypoglycaemia: Evidence in 2023.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Abnormal glucose homeostasis and fasting intolerance in patients with congenital porto-systemic shunts.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Accuracy and impact on quality of life of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy, Nondiabetic Young Children.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly being used both for day-to-day management in patients with diabetes and in clinical research. While data on glycemic profiles of healthy, nondiabetic individuals exist, data on nondiabetic very young children are lacking. Objective: This work aimed to establish reference sensor glucose ranges in healthy, nondiabetic young children, using a current-generation CGM sensor. Methods: This prospective observational study took place in an institutional practice with healthy, nondiabetic children aged 1 to 6 years with normal body mass index. A blinded Dexcom G6 Pro CGM was worn for approximately 10 days by each participant. Main outcome measures included CGM metrics of mean glucose, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability. Results: Thirty-nine participants were included in the analyses. Mean average glucose was 103 mg/dL (5.7 mmol/L). Median percentage time between 70 and 140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L) was 96% (interquartile range, 92%-97%), mean within-individual coefficient of variation was 17 ± 3%, median time spent with glucose levels greater than 140 mg/dL was 3.4% (49 min/day), and median time less than 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) was 0.4% (6 min/day). Conclusion: Collecting normative sensor glucose data and describing glycemic measures for young children fill an important informational gap and will be useful as a benchmark for future clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.