ArticlePulmonary circulation2022
Ventricular mass discriminates pulmonary arterial hypertension as redefined at the Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vascular compliance phenotyping in pulmonary arterial hypertension (a PVDOMICS study).JHLT open · 2026Article
- Integrative bioinformatics approach for identifying key genes and potential therapeutic targets in the concurrent manifestation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- The Role of Cardiac MRI in Pulmonary Hypertension- Is it Still an Underutilized Tool.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2024Review
- Assessment of Right Ventricular Function-a State of the Art.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Ventricular mass discriminates pulmonary arterial hypertension as redefined at the Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) measures of right ventricular (RV) mass, volumes, and function have diagnostic and prognostic value in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We hypothesized that RV mass-based metrics would discriminate incident PAH as redefined by the lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) threshold of >20 mmHg at the Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (6th WSPH). Eighty-nine subjects with suspected PAH underwent CMR imaging, including 64 subjects with systemic sclerosis (SSc). CMR metrics, including RV and left ventricular (LV) mass, were measured. All subjects underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) for assessment of hemodynamics within 48 h of CMR. Using generalized linear models, associations between CMR metrics and PAH were assessed, the best subset of CMR variables for predicting PAH were identified, and relationships between mass-based metrics, hemodynamics, and other predictive CMR metrics were examined. Fifty-nine subjects met 6th WSPH criteria for PAH. RV mass metrics, including ventricular mass index (VMI), demonstrated the greatest magnitude difference between subjects with versus without PAH. Overall and in SSc, VMI and RV mass measured by CMR were among the most predictive variables discriminating PAH at RHC, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86 and 0.83. respectively. VMI increased linearly with pulmonary vascular resistance and with mPAP in PAH, including in lower ranges of mPAP associated with mild PAH. VMI ≥ 0.37 yielded a positive predictive value of 90% for discriminating PAH. RV mass metrics measured by CMR, including VMI, discriminate incident, treatment-naïve PAH as defined by 6th WSPH criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.