Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35506038›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2022

Gut microbiome as a potential biomarker of cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease.

Ryan Lane Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Colorectal cancer and microbiota: systematic review.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan Lane JonesHarris-Stowe State University, St. Louis, United States.
Harris–Stowe State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a term used for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis that are characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, has been suggested to be closely related to high risk of developing colorectal or gastric cancer [1]. Focusing on patient cases and studies, this study aims to identify the cause of a possible correlation between IBD and cancerous cells, and determine the influence of IBD on cancerous cells in patients. A gut microbiome analysis was utilized to understand the mechanisms of the disease and to find associations with it in patients. I analyzed the experimental data obtained through amplicon sequencing to target regions of interest, and determined genes associated with the correlation by using coding programs. Biological processes, which are regulated by many means including the control of gene expression, were shown to be increased in patients with IBD compared to healthy subjects. Two datasets were used, with one going over an amplicon sequence analysis of fecal samples from healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. I performed gut metagenome analysis on the data of the patients' fecal samples. This along with taxonomy analysis allows me to see percentages of certain bacterium in the gut and find a link. I was able to determine that the patients with IBD had a higher percentage of dark matter and a higher guanine to cytosine content (GC-content) percentage. This huge difference in the amount of dark matter and GC-content in an individual's human gut metagenome could be an indicator of someone potentially developing a disease.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer (CRC)inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)placenta-specific 8 (PLAC8)Sequence Read Archive Taxonomy Analysis Tool (STAT)

Identifiers

PMID35506038
PMCPMC9052348
OpenAlexW4225366617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.