ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2022
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Best Practices for Gastrointestinal Endoscopists.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal trends in colorectal resections for benign colorectal neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Prevention of Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Functional hydrogels as submucosal injectable materials in therapeutic endoscopy.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Dietary fiber as a microbiota-modulating strategy after endoscopic mucosa resection: A new frontier in postoperative care.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review of innovations in cancer diagnosis and management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- A staged approach to resecting a large rectal polyp using endoscopic mucosal resection and trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Dual Channel Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment.eGastroenterology · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Challenges for Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Take It or Leave It?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Research trends on endoscopic mucosal resection: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2021.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an endoscopic technique used to remove sessile or flat lesions from the gastrointestinal tract. This article reviews EMR and focuses on large colorectal polyps, which constitute the most common indication for EMR. Various methods of polyp evaluation can help gastroenterologists determine whether EMR is feasible and whether referral to an advanced endoscopist may be necessary. Techniques for performing EMR include conventional hot-snare EMR with submucosal injection and electro-cautery snare removal of colorectal lesions, as well as alternative EMR techniques such as cold-snare EMR and underwater EMR. Key adverse events associated with EMR include bleeding, perforation, and post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome. Finally, as residual or recurrent polyp formation is possible regardless of EMR technique, this article addresses the importance of surveillance post-EMR and the patients who are at highest risk for polyp recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35506001PMC9053487W4229059018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.