Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505912›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & policy2022

Are stakeholders ready to transform phosphorus use in food systems? A transdisciplinary study in a livestock intensive system.

Julia Martin-Ortega, Shane A Rothwell, Aine Anderson, Murat Okumah, Christopher Lyon, Erin Sherry, Christopher Johnston, Paul J A Withers, Donnacha G Doody

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Martin-OrtegaSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Shane A RothwellLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Aine AndersonLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Murat OkumahSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Christopher LyonSustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Erin SherrySustainable Agri-food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Christopher JohnstonSustainable Agri-food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Paul J A WithersLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Donnacha G DoodySustainable Agri-food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute · GBLancaster University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food systems worldwide are vulnerable to Phosphorus (P) supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Current P use is also highly inefficient, generating large surpluses and pollution. Global food security and aquatic ecosystems are in jeopardy if transformative action is not taken. This paper pivots from earlier (predominantly conceptual) work to develop and analyse a P transdisciplinary scenario process, assessing stakeholders potential for transformative thinking in P use in the food system. Northern Ireland, a highly livestock-intensive system, was used as case study for illustrating such process. The stakeholder engagement takes a normative stance in that it sets the explicit premise that the food system needs to be transformed and asks stakeholders to engage in a dialogue on how that transformation can be achieved. A Substance Flow Analysis of P flows and stocks was employed to construct visions for alternative futures and stimulate stakeholder discussions on system responses. These were analysed for their transformative potential using a triple-loop social learning framework. For the most part, stakeholder responses remained transitional or incremental, rather than being fundamentally transformative. The process did unveil some deeper levers that could be acted upon to move the system further along the spectrum of transformational change (e.g. changes in food markets, creation of new P markets, destocking, new types of land production and radical land use changes), providing clues of what an aspirational system could look like. Replicated and adapted elsewhere, this process can serve as diagnostics of current stakeholders thinking and potential, as well as for the identification of those deeper levers, opening up avenues to work upon for global scale transformation.

Indexed as

AgricultureNorthern IrelandParticipationScenario analysisSocial learningSubstance Flow AnalysisTransformations

Identifiers

PMID35505912
PMCPMC8895547
OpenAlexW4213287637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.