ArticleEvolutionary applications2022
Temporal and region-specific variations in genome-wide inbreeding effects on female size and reproduction traits of rainbow trout.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Runs of Homozygosity and Inferences in Wild Populations.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Muscle Elasticity in the Large Yellow Croaker: Insights from Transcriptomics and Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Aquaponics as a Promising Strategy to Mitigate Impacts of Climate Change on Rainbow Trout Culture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Genomics applied to livestock and aquaculture breeding.Evolutionary applications · 2022Review
- Temporal and region-specific variations in genome-wide inbreeding effects on female size and reproduction traits of rainbow trout.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Development of a High-Density 665 K SNP Array for Rainbow Trout Genome-Wide Genotyping.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that current levels of inbreeding, estimated by runs of homozygosity (ROH), are moderate to high in farmed rainbow trout lines. Based on ROH metrics, the aims of our study were to (i) quantify inbreeding effects on female size (postspawning body weight, fork length) and reproduction traits (spawning date, coelomic fluid weight, spawn weight, egg number, average egg weight) in rainbow trout, and (ii) identify both the genomic regions and inbreeding events affecting performance. We analysed the performance of 1346 females under linear animal models including random additive and dominance genetics effects, with fixed covariates accounting for inbreeding effects at different temporal and genomic scales. A significant effect of genome-wide inbreeding (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.