Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505790›Full record

ReviewPain reports

Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

Anja Geisler, Josephine Zachodnik, Kasper Køppen, Rehan Chakari, Rachid Bech-Azeddine

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Dynamic versus rigid lumbar fixation: A multimodal comparison of paraspinal muscle morphology, electromyography, and functional outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Opioid Sparing Analgesics in Spine Surgery.Advances in orthopedics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anja GeislerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital,Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2672
Josephine ZachodnikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital,Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-7496
Kasper KøppenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital,Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-842X
Rehan ChakariDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery, Akademiska University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rachid Bech-AzeddineCopenhagen Spine Research Unit (CSRU), Section of Spine Surgery, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-313X
Zealand University Hospital · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKLund University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural, ketamine, local infiltration analgesia, and intrathecal morphine. The results showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption for treatment with NSAID (

Indexed as

AnalgesicsPainPain treatmentSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID35505790
PMCPMC9049031
OpenAlexW4229067220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.