Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505731›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

COVID-19 and the Otolaryngology Match: An Increase in Applicants Remaining Close to Home.

Cees T Whisonant, Shawhin R Shahriari, Casey D McDonald, Addi N Moya, Amanda Ederle, Gregory Borah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Otolaryngology Residency Application Trends and Match Outcomes at a Large Academic Medical Center.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Plastic Surgery Match Trends in 2022.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cees T WhisonantDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Shawhin R ShahriariDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Casey D McDonaldDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Addi N MoyaDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Amanda EderleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baptist Health, Little Rock, USA.
Gregory BorahDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
University of New Mexico · USBaptist Health Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOtolaryngology residency remains one of the most competitive surgical subspecialties to apply for with a 63% match rate in 2021. This is a difficult and stressful process for applicants in any given year, and it was even further complicated by restrictions mandated by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) protections. Analyzing geographical trends in successfully matched applicants provides prospective applicants and programs with helpful information about how previous trends were affected by the pandemic as we look toward future match cycles.

methodsThe medical schools of 1,587 successfully matched applicants from 2017-2021 were identified and compared to the 116 otolaryngology residency programs. Successful applicants' medical school state and region were then compared to the location of their matched residency program state and region. From this, we evaluated the number of applicants matching at the residency program affiliated with their medical school or at a residency program within the same state or region as their home medical school.

resultsA significant increase in the percentage of applicants matching at their home program and within their home state (p < 0.001) occurred in 2021 when compared to previous years. Applicants matching within their home region was not found to increase significantly (p = 0.43) in 2021 compared to previously. The regions with the greatest increase in the percentage of applicants matching to their home programs were the Northeast and Midwest (12% increase), while the Midwest had the largest increase in percentage of applicants matching within their home state (15%).

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the otolaryngology match in 2021 with applicants and programs alike choosing to stay closer to home with their residency match selections. Overall, regional location remains a major determinant of future residency location for otolaryngology applicants, and this did not change significantly during 2021, but applicants matched more frequently at their home medical school program. It is anticipated that the match process will be similar in 2022 given the ongoing pandemic, so the importance of home program and region will likely be emphasized again.

Indexed as

covid-19otolaryngologyotolaryngology residencyresidencythe match

Identifiers

PMID35505731
PMCPMC9053550
OpenAlexW4220916292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.