ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2023
iCare® Home vs Goldmann applanation tonometry: Agreement of methods and comparison of inter-observer variation at a tertiary eye centre.
Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home monitoring devices for glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Intraocular pressure changes during ventilator weaning: a prospective observational study highlighting PaCO₂-related physiological monitoring signals in ICU patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- A Comparative Analysis of Intraocular Pressure Measurement across Different Tonometry Methods and Experience Levels.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Observational
- Article
- Reliability of Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure With iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Observational
- Patient Perspectives on Home Tonometer Usage for Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Home Tonometry Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Patterns, Patient Adherence, and Measurement Reliability in a Prospective Clinical Cohort.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Central Corneal Thickness and Glaucoma Risk: The Importance of Corneal Pachymetry in Screening Adults Over 50 and Glaucoma Suspects.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Glaucoma Home Self-Testing Using VR Visual Fields and Rebound Tonometry Versus In-Clinic Perimetry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Pilot Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Home iCare - What we already know.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.