Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505610›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2022

Cancer as a biophysical disease: Targeting the mechanical-adaptability program.

Ly T S Nguyen, Mark Allan C Jacob, Eleana Parajón, Douglas N Robinson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Actin in action.Nature methods · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biophysics of cancer.Biophysical journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ly T S NguyenDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark Allan C JacobDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Eleana ParajónDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Douglas N RobinsonDepartment of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: dnr@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Biochemical Basis for the Mechanics of CytokinesisR01GM066817 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINSON, DOUGLAS N · 2003 to 2025
$7.3M
Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences Training Program: Enhancing Inclusivity Through Universal Design for Learning in Graduate CoursesT32GM135083 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Caren L. Freel Meyers · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066817NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the number of cancer cases projected to significantly increase over time, researchers are currently exploring "nontraditional" research fields in the pursuit of novel therapeutics. One emerging area that is steadily gathering interest revolves around cellular mechanical machinery. When looking broadly at the physical properties of cancer, it has been debated whether a cancer could be defined as either stiffer or softer across cancer types. With numerous articles supporting both sides, the evidence instead suggests that cancer is not particularly regimented. Instead, cancer is highly adaptable, allowing it to endure the constantly changing microenvironments cancer cells encounter, such as tumor compression and the shear forces in the vascular system and body. What allows cancer cells to achieve this adaptability are the particular proteins that make up the mechanical network, leading to a particular mechanical program of the cancer cell. Coincidentally, some of these proteins, such as myosin II, α-actinins, filamins, and actin, have either altered expression in cancer and/or some type of direct involvement in cancer progression. For this reason, targeting the mechanical system as a therapeutic strategy may lead to more efficacious treatments in the future. However, targeting the mechanical program is far from trivial. As involved as the mechanical program is in cancer development and metastasis, it also helps drive many other key cellular processes, such as cell division, cell adhesion, metabolism, and motility. Therefore, anti-cancer treatments targeting the mechanical program must take great care to avoid potential side effects. Here, we introduce the potential of targeting the mechanical program while also providing its challenges and shortcomings as a strategy for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

ActinsNeoplasmsActininFilaminsHumansMyosin Type IITumor MicroenvironmentActininActinsFilaminsMyosin Type IIactin crosslinkerscancer progressioncortical mechanicsmechanical adaptabilitymyosin II

Identifiers

PMID35505610
PMCPMC9617128
OpenAlexW4225296374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.