Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505524›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2022

Canine mast cell tumours part I: Clinical and survival outcomes.

Vanessa S Tamlin, Cynthia D K Bottema, Lucy Woolford, Elizabeth C Dobson, Allan E Kessell, Anne E Peaston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mutational Landscape ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Anal sac mast cell tumor in a dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa S TamlinAustralian Genome Research Facility Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2732-5369
Cynthia D K BottemaSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-0099
Lucy WoolfordSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-2937
Elizabeth C DobsonASAP Pathology Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia.
Allan E KessellGribbles Veterinary Pathology, Glenside, Australia.
Anne E PeastonSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7501-2415
The University of Adelaide · AUAGRF Ltd · AUAustralian Institute of Business · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDogs have a species-specific susceptibility for developing mast cell tumours (MCTs). Mutations in the KIT proto-oncogene (KIT) are known to contribute to the neoplastic biology of mast cells. In dogs, the most common KIT mutation is an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in exon 11 which has been considered a useful prognostic supplement to traditional histopathological tumour grading.

objectiveThe aim of this retrospective study was to explore the importance of KIT exon 11 ITD mutation status and known clinical and pathological indices in predicting prognosis in a cohort of Australian dogs diagnosed with MCT.

methodsClinical parameters, survival data, and KIT mutation status were collected and assessed for 220 dogs with cutaneous or subcutaneous MCT (n = 189 and n = 31, respectively).

resultsIn at least one of the multivariable models, tumour grade (cutaneous Kiupel low or high grade) or tumour subcutaneous location, multiple concurrent MCTs, metastasis at the time of surgery, and senior age were statistically significant in predicting the outcome (MCT-related death and/or second MCT diagnosis) at 6- or 12-month post-tumour excision. KIT exon 11 ITD mutation status was not a significant predictor in any of the final multivariable models and was strongly correlated with high histological grade (p < 0.001).

conclusionIn this sample of dogs, tumour histological grading remained the single most powerful prognostic indicator for MCT outcome. However, concurrent evaluation of multiple prognostically significant parameters provides information of potential value to inform therapeutic management for each patient.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsAustraliaDogsHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitRetrospective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitdogKITmutationprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35505524
PMCPMC9297790
OpenAlexW4225416987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.