Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505402›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

The first COVID-19 new graduate nurses generation: findings from an Italian cross-sectional study.

Alvisa Palese, Anna Brugnolli, Illarj Achil, Elisa Mattiussi, Stefano Fabris, Satu Kajander-Unkuri, Valerio Dimonte, Luca Grassetti, Matteo Danielis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy. alvisa.palese@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-844X
Anna BrugnolliDepartment of Public Health, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Illarj AchilDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Elisa MattiussiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Stefano FabrisDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Satu Kajander-UnkuriDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-5856
Valerio DimonteDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-3481
Luca GrassettiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Matteo DanielisDepartment of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria 20, 33100, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-3452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing education has been disrupted by the onset of the COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, potentially impacting learning experiences and perceived competencies at the time of graduation. However, the learning experiences of students since the onset of COVID-19, their perceived competences achieved and the employment status one month after graduation, have not been traced to date.

methodsA cross sectional online survey measured the individual profile, the learning experience in the last academic year and the perceived competences of the first COVID-19 new nursing graduates in two Italian universities. Details relating to employment status and place of employment (Covid-19 versus non-COVID-19 units) one month after graduation were also collected and the data compared with those reported by a similar cohort of new graduates pre-pandemic in 2018-2019. All those who graduated in November 2020 and attended their third year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were eligible. The online survey included individual, nursing programme and first working experience variables alongside the Nurse Competence Scale (NCS). Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 323 new graduates participated. In their last academic year, they experienced a single, long clinical placement in non-COVID-19 units. One month after graduation, 54.5% (n = 176) were working in COVID-19 units, 22.9% (n = 74) in non-COVID-19 units and 22.6 (n = 73) were unemployed. There was no statistical difference among groups regarding individual variables and the competences perceived. Fewer new graduates working in COVID-19 units experienced a transition programme compared to those working in non-COVID-19 units (p = 0.053). At the NCS, the first COVID-19 new graduate generation perceived significantly lower competences than the pre-COVID-19 generation in the 'Helping role' factor and a significant higher in 'Ensuring quality' and 'Therapeutic interventions' factors.

conclusionsThe majority of the first COVID-19 new graduate generation had been employed in COVID-19 units without clinical experience and transition programmes, imposing an ethical debate regarding (a) the role of education in graduating nurses in challenging times with limited clinical placements; and (b) that of nurse managers and directors in ensuring safe transitions for new graduates. Despite the profound clinical placement revision, the first COVID-19 new graduate generation reported competences similar to those of the pre-COVID-19 generation, suggesting that the pandemic may have helped them to optimise the clinical learning process.

Indexed as

CompetencesCOVID-19Cross-sectional studyNew graduatesNursing educationNursing students

Identifiers

PMID35505402
PMCPMC9062856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.