ArticleBMC medical education2022
Can stoic training develop medical student empathy and resilience? A mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation and outcomes of mental health literacy training in pre-licensure health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of resilience training on resilience and stress in medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of a Stoicism-Based Educational Package on Psychological Distress and Self-Efficacy in Patients Under Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Impact of sensitisation workshop on empathy levels among postgraduate students: A pre-post interventional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Fostering empathy in healthcare: impact of a simulation-based educational program on professionals' relational skills.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Empathy levels among health sciences professors in Latin America: distribution, classification and gender differences.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The pitfalls of "toughing it out": mapping stoic attitudes in cancer patients. A scoping review.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Synergy between resilience and empathy in health sciences students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancing self-care education amongst medical students: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Mediating and Suppressing Effects of Coping Styles Between Resilience and Empathy for Pain in Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Resilience and empathy in pharmacy interns: Insights from a three-year cohort study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Curated collections for educators: Nine key articles and article series for teaching qualitative research methods.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- Systematic Review of Healthcare Curriculum for Training in Emotional Intelligence Within Physicians, Residents, and Medical Students.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
- Application of Stoic Philosophy Teachings in Nursing and Allied Health: A Scoping Review.SAGE open nursingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmpathic erosion and burnout represent crises within medicine. Psychological training has been used to promote empathy and personal resilience, yet some training useful within adjacent fields remain unexplored, e.g., Stoic training. Given recent research within psychology suggesting that Stoic training increases emotional wellbeing, exploring this type of training within health professions education is important. We therefore asked: What impact would a Stoicism informed online training package have on third year medical students' resilience and empathy?
methods24 third year medical students took part in 12 days of online training (SeRenE), based on Stoic philosophy, and co-developed with psychotherapists. A mixed-methods study was conducted to evaluate impact. Pre- and post-SeRenE students completed the Stoic Attitudes and Behaviours Scale (SABS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). All students completed semi-structured interviews following training and 2 months post-SeRenE. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse qualitative data, whilst within subjects t-tests and correlational analyses were conducted on quantitative data.
resultsQuantitatively, stoic ideation, resilience and empathy increased post-training, with correlational analyses suggesting resilience and empathy increase in tandem. Qualitatively, four themes were identified: 1. Negative visualisation aids emotional and practical preparedness; 2. Stoic mindfulness encourages students to think about how they think and feel; 3. Stoic reflection develops the empathic imagination; and 4. Evaluating the accessibility of SeRenE.
conclusionsOur data lend support to the ability of Stoic-based psychological training to positively influence resilience and empathy. Although, quantitatively, results were mixed, qualitative data offers rich insight. The practice of negative visualisation, promoted by SeRenE, encourages student self-efficacy and planning, domains of resilience associated with academic success. Further, this study demonstrates a connection between Stoic practice and empathy, which manifests through development of the empathic imagination and a sense of empathic bravery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.