Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505322›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

An exploratory study of client and provider experience and perceptions of facility-based childbirth care in Quiché, Guatemala.

Reena Sethi, Kathleen Hill, Suzanne Stalls, Susan Moffson, Sandra Saenz de Tejada, Leonel Gomez, Miguel Angel Marroquin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reena SethiJhpiego, Baltimore, USA.
Kathleen HillJhpiego, Baltimore, USA.
Suzanne StallsMomentum Country and Global Leadership, Washington, USA.
Susan MoffsonMomentum Country and Global Leadership, Washington, USA. Susan.Moffson@jhpiego.org.
Sandra Saenz de TejadaIndependent Researcher, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Leonel GomezReproductive Health Independent Researcher/Consultant, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Miguel Angel MarroquinJhpiego, Guatemala City, Guatemala.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-14-00028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespectful maternity care (RMC) is fundamental to women's and families' experience of care and their decision about where to give birth. Studies from multiple countries describe the mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth, though only a small number of studies from Guatemala have been published. Less information is available on women's negative and positive experiences of childbirth care and health workers' perceptions and experiences of providing maternity care.

methodsAs part of a program implemented in the Western Highlands of Guatemala to improve quality of reproductive maternal newborn and child health care, a mixed methods assessment was conducted in three hospitals and surrounding areas to understand women's and health workers' experience and perceptions of maternity care. The quantitative component included a survey of 31 maternity health workers and 140 women who had recently given birth in these hospitals. The qualitative component included in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with women and maternity health workers and managers.

resultsWomen reported a mix of positive and negative experiences of childbirth care related to interpersonal and health system factors. 81% of surveyed women reported that health workers had treated them with respect while 21.4% of women reported verbal abuse. Fifty-five percent and 12% of women, respectively, reported not having access to a private toilet and bath or shower. During IDIs and FGDs, many women described higher rates of verbal abuse directed at women who do not speak Spanish. A regression analysis of survey results indicated that speaking Ixil or K'iche at home was associated with a higher likelihood of women being treated negatively during childbirth in a facility. Health worker survey results corroborated negative aspects of care described by women and also reported mistreatment of health workers by clients and families (70.9%) and colleagues (48.2%).

conclusionsThis study adds to the literature on women's experience of institutional childbirth and factors that influence this experience by triangulating experience and perceptions of both women and health workers. This assessment highlights opportunities to address mistreatment of both women and health workers and to build on positive care attributes to strengthen RMC for all women.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelChildFemaleGuatemalaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParturitionPregnancyQuality of Health CareChildbirthExperience of careGuatemalaHumanizing childbirthHuman rights abuseMistreatmentObstetric violenceProfessional-patient relationshipQuality of careRMC

Identifiers

PMID35505322
PMCPMC9066966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.