Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505278›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Determinants of associated events following AZD1222 (Covishield) vaccination in a high-risk population in Nepal.

Kapil Madi Poudel, Neha Shah, Manab Prakash, Santosh Kumar Deo, Sunita Bhandari, Tika Ram Poudel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kapil Madi PoudelInstitute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-7435
Neha ShahDhankuta Institute of Health Science, Dhankuta, 56800, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-9901
Manab PrakashCentral Department of Economics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, 44600, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-2981
Santosh Kumar DeoBirat Medical College, Biratnagar, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-2140
Sunita BhandariBP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, 56700, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-8862
Tika Ram PoudelGoldenGate International College, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal. rupendrapoudel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-022X
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPTribhuvan University · NPBiratnagar Eye Hospital · NPTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is the most effective method to prevent the spread of infectious diseases and helps reduce mortality rate and economic costs associated with the pandemic. Despite these advantages, misinformation on vaccine safety and efficacy can lead to increased hesitation towards vaccination. This study reports the incidence of adverse events following Covishield vaccination, their associated factors, medication used for their management, and attitudes about vaccine safety.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from the sample of Covishield-vaccinated individuals from a secondary hospital, two primary health centres, and 36 health posts in eastern Nepal. Individuals (n = 602) were randomly sampled from a population (n = 1013) who had received the first dose of Covishield, namely frontline workers and other high-risk populations. The second-round follow-up had 516 participants. Association of incidence and severity of post-vaccination events with socio-demographic variables, comorbidity status, and medication use were estimated.

resultsAmong the 79.9% of participants who reported adverse events after receiving the first dose, two-thirds of complaints were mild (67.4%, 95% CI 63.2-71.6) with the most common complaint being pain at the injection site (86.5%). Paracetamol or its combination with NSAIDs were used in the majority of cases (95.2%). After the second dose, only 31.2% (95% CI 27.2-35.2) reported adverse events, the overwhelming majority of which were mild (95.7%) and required a lower frequency of medication (7.5% vs. 26.0%). Adverse event following immunization were significantly associated with being 18-30 years old (χ

conclusionsOverall, vaccination-associated events were mild and majority were managed with paracetamol or its combination. Effective counselling about adverse events before vaccination should be prioritized to reduce hesitation and fear.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAcetaminophenAdolescentAdultChAdOx1 nCoV-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNepalVaccinationYoung AdultAcetaminophenChAdOx1 nCoV-19Influenza VaccinesAdverse eventComorbidityCOVID-19CovishieldSocio-demographic characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35505278
PMCPMC9062853
OpenAlexW4225312579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.