Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505214›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Workflow to Mine Frequent DNA Co-methylation Clusters in DNA Methylome Data.

Jie Zhang, Kun Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ZhangDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. jizhan@iu.edu.
Kun HuangDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advances in high-throughput nucleotide sequencing technology revolutionized biomedical research. Vast amount of genomic data rapidly accumulates in a daily basis, which in turn calls for the development of powerful bioinformatics tools and efficient workflows to analyze them. One of the approaches to address the "big data" issue is to mine highly correlated clusters/networks of biological molecules, which may provide rich yet hidden information about the underlying functional, regulatory, or structural relationships among genes, proteins, genomic loci or various types of biological molecules or events. A network mining algorithm lmQCM has recently been developed, which can be applied to mine tightly connected correlation clusters (networks) in large biological data with big sample size, and it guarantees a lower bound of the cluster density. This algorithm has been used in a variety of cancer transcriptomic data to mine gene co-expression networks (GCNs), but it can be applied to any correlational matrix. lmQCM is available through R package lmQCM as well as the online tool package TSUNAMI ( https://biolearns.medicine.iu.edu ). In this study, the purpose is to establish an analytical workflow to apply lmQCM for frequent (consensus) cluster mining in multiple DNA methylation datasets in different cancers and extract the underlying common co-methylation networks for genes.Specifically, the workflow is applied to analyze DNA methylome data across different cancer types using lmQCM. It mines frequent DNA methylation clusters based on individual clustering mining results, identifying common as well as distinctive DNA methylation patterns among different cancer types. This workflow has successfully identified frequent GCNs in 33 types of cancers, thus proven to be a powerful tool to analyze large biological data. It helps to identify common features as well as distinctions among different diseases, disease subtypes, or among different biological processes. The resulted frequent clusters may provide new insights on the pathway/function networks. In the case of disease study, the results lead to new directions for biomarker and drug target discovery. The advantages of this workflow include the highly efficient processing of large biological data generated from high-throughput experiments, quick identification of highly correlated interaction networks, substantial reduction of the data dimensionality to a manageable number of variables for downstream comparative analysis, and consequently increased statistical power for detecting differences between conditions.

Indexed as

EpigenomeNeoplasmsDNADNA MethylationHumansWorkflowDNACluster miningDNA co-methylationEpigeneticsFrequent network mininglmQCMPan-cancer methylation

Identifiers

PMID35505214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.