Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35505213›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

DNA Methylation Imputation Across Platforms.

Gang Li, Guosheng Zhang, Yun Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gang LiDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Guosheng ZhangDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yun LiDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. yun_li@med.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this chapter, we will provide a review on imputation in the context of DNA methylation, specifically focusing on a penalized functional regression (PFR) method we have previously developed. We will start with a brief review of DNA methylation, genomic and epigenomic contexts where imputation has proven beneficial in practice, and statistical or computational methods proposed for DNA methylation in the recent literature (Subheading 1). The rest of the chapter (Subheadings 2-4) will provide a detailed review of our PFR method proposed for across-platform imputation, which incorporates nonlocal information using a penalized functional regression framework. Subheading 2 introduces commonly employed technologies for DNA methylation measurement and describes the real dataset we have used in the development of our method: the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Subheading 3 comprehensively reviews our method, encompassing data harmonization prior to model building, the actual building of penalized functional regression model, post-imputation quality filter, and imputation quality assessment. Subheading 4 shows the performance of our method in both simulation and the TCGA AML dataset, demonstrating that our penalized functional regression model is a valuable across-platform imputation tool for DNA methylation data, particularly because of its ability to boost statistical power for subsequent epigenome-wide association study. Finally, Subheading 5 provides future perspectives on imputation for DNA methylation data.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteEpigenomicsGenomicsHumansRegression AnalysisDNA methylation imputationEpigenome-wide association studyEpigenomic imputationPenalized functional regression

Identifiers

PMID35505213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.