ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
DNA Methylation Imputation Across Platforms.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast matrix completion in epigenetic methylation studies with informative covariates.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this chapter, we will provide a review on imputation in the context of DNA methylation, specifically focusing on a penalized functional regression (PFR) method we have previously developed. We will start with a brief review of DNA methylation, genomic and epigenomic contexts where imputation has proven beneficial in practice, and statistical or computational methods proposed for DNA methylation in the recent literature (Subheading 1). The rest of the chapter (Subheadings 2-4) will provide a detailed review of our PFR method proposed for across-platform imputation, which incorporates nonlocal information using a penalized functional regression framework. Subheading 2 introduces commonly employed technologies for DNA methylation measurement and describes the real dataset we have used in the development of our method: the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Subheading 3 comprehensively reviews our method, encompassing data harmonization prior to model building, the actual building of penalized functional regression model, post-imputation quality filter, and imputation quality assessment. Subheading 4 shows the performance of our method in both simulation and the TCGA AML dataset, demonstrating that our penalized functional regression model is a valuable across-platform imputation tool for DNA methylation data, particularly because of its ability to boost statistical power for subsequent epigenome-wide association study. Finally, Subheading 5 provides future perspectives on imputation for DNA methylation data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35505213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.