Trial reportTranslational stroke research2022
Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Translational stroke research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of 35 mg of recombinant human prourokinase for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 h: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Head-to-Head: Recombinant Human Prourokinase Versus Intravenous Thrombolytics in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic drugs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours of Stroke Onset: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-assessed network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Adjuvant therapy with total salvianolic acid injection enhances the safety and efficacy of recombinant prourokinase in ischemic stroke by mitigating blood-brain barrier disruption.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Reperfusion Therapy and Cytoprotection for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Rapid Blood Clot Removal via Remote Delamination and Magnetization of Clot Debris.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Updates in Intravenous Thrombolysis Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asian Populations.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Various Intravenous Thrombolytics for Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) at Various Dosages: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- Rationale and design of ProUrokinase in Mild IsChemic strokE (PUMICE): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint controlled trial.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
- Understanding the Pathophysiology of Ischemic Stroke: The Basis of Current Therapies and Opportunity for New Ones.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) is a novel thrombolytic that has been approved to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the safety and efficacy of intravenous rhPro-UK in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has not been well established. We aimed to investigate the safety and preliminary efficacy of rhPro-UK in patients with AIS in a multi-center phase IIa trial setting. One hundred nineteen patients within 4.5 h of AIS onset were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, 23-center phase IIa clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 35 mg (n = 40) or 50 mg (n = 39) intravenous rhPro-UK or 0.9 mg/kg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA; n = 40). The primary endpoint was functional independence defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The secondary outcome was early neurological improvement defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 24 h after drug administration. Safety endpoints included death due to any cause, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and other serious adverse events (SAEs). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of ≤ 1 at 90 days did not differ significantly among three groups (35 mg rhPro-UK: 55.56% vs. 50 mg rhPro-UK: 57.89% vs. vs. r-tPA: 52.63%; P = 0.92). The rates of treatment response, referring to early neurological improvement, were similar among these three groups (36.11% vs. 31.58% vs. 28.95%, respectively; P = 0.85). There was no difference in mortality at 90 days or in the rate of other SAEs among the three groups. One patient in the 50 mg rhPro-UK group suffered sICH. While neither the primary efficacy outcomes nor safety profile differed significantly among the low, high rhPro-UK and control groups, it is a logical step to further test the low-dose rhPro-UK group versus the control group in a well-powered phase III study.Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Identifier: ChiCTR1800016519. Date of registration: June 6 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.