ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
The Chicken Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as an In Vivo Model for Photodynamic Therapy.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many decades the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) has been used for research as an in vivo model in a large number of different fields, including toxicology, bioengineering, and cancer research. More specifically, the CAM is also a suitable and convenient model system in the field of photodynamic therapy (PDT), mainly due to the easy access of its membrane and the possibility of grafting or growing tumors on the membrane and, interestingly, to study the PDT effects on its dense vascular network. In addition, the CAM is simple to handle and cheap. Since the CAM is not innervated until later stages of the embryo development, its use in research is simplified compared to other in vivo models as far as ethical and regulatory issues are concerned. In this review different incubation and drug administration protocols of relevance for PDT are presented. Moreover, data regarding the propagation of light at different wavelengths and CAM development stages are provided. Finally, the effects induced by photobiomodulation on the CAM angiogenesis and its impact on PDT treatment outcome are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35505014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.