Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35504962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Attenuated G protein signaling and minimal receptor phosphorylation as a biochemical signature of low side-effect opioid analgesics.

Pooja Dasgupta, Anika Mann, Willma E Polgar, Rainer K Reinscheid, Nurulain T Zaveri, Stefan Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pooja DasguptaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Drackendorfer Straße 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Anika MannDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Drackendorfer Straße 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Willma E PolgarAstraea Therapeutics, 320 Logue Avenue, Suite 142, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA.
Rainer K ReinscheidDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Drackendorfer Straße 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Nurulain T ZaveriAstraea Therapeutics, 320 Logue Avenue, Suite 142, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA.
Stefan SchulzDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Drackendorfer Straße 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. Stefan.Schulz@med.uni-jena.de.
Astraea Therapeutics (United States) · USFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-receptor targeting has been proposed as a promising strategy for the development of opioid analgesics with fewer side effects. Cebranopadol and AT-121 are prototypical bifunctional ligands targeting the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor (NOP) and µ-opioid receptor (MOP) that elicit potent analgesia in humans and nonhuman primates, respectively. Cebranopadol was reported to produce typical MOP-related side effects such as respiratory depression and reward, whereas AT-121 appeared to be devoid of these liabilities. However, the molecular basis underlying different side effect profiles in opioid analgesics remains unknown. Here, we examine agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation and G protein signaling profiles of a series of chemically diverse mixed MOP/NOP agonists, including cebranopadol and AT-121. We found that these compounds produce strikingly different MOP phosphorylation profiles. Cebranopadol, AT-034 and AT-324 stimulated extensive MOP phosphorylation, whereas AT-201 induced selective phosphorylation at S375 only. AT-121, on the other hand, did not promote any detectable MOP phosphorylation. Conversely, none of these compounds was able to elicit strong NOP phosphorylation and low NOP receptor phosphorylation correlated with partial agonism in a GIRK-channel assay. Our results suggest a close correlation between MOP receptor phosphorylation and side effect profile. Thus, bifunctional MOP/NOP opioid ligands combining low efficacy G protein signaling at both NOP and MOP with no detectable receptor phosphorylation appear to be devoid of side-effects such as respiratory depression, abuse liability or tolerance development, as with AT-121.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsRespiratory InsufficiencyAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsPhosphorylationReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID35504962
PMCPMC9065038
OpenAlexW4225330661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.