Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35504927›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

Hemodynamic profiling by critical care echocardiography could be more accurate than invasive techniques and help identify targets for treatment.

Stefan Schmidt, Jana-Katharina Dieks, Michael Quintel, Onnen Moerer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan SchmidtDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Jana-Katharina DieksDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. jana.dieks@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this prospective observational study, non-invasive critical care echocardiography (CCE) was used to obtain quantitative hemodynamic parameters in 107 intensive care unit (ICU) patients; the parameters were then visualized in a novel web graph approach to increase the understanding and impact of CCE abnormalities, as an alternative to thermodilution techniques. Visualizing the CCE hemodynamic data in six-dimensional web graph plots was feasible in almost all ICU patients. In 23.1% of patients, significant tricuspid regurgitation prevented correlation between thermodilution techniques and echocardiographic hemodynamics. Two parameters of longitudinal right ventricular function (TAPSE and S') did not correlate in ICU patients. Clinical surrogate parameters of hemodynamic compromise did not correlate with measured hemodynamics. 26.2% of the patients with mean arterial pressures above 60 mmHg had cardiac indices (CI) below 2.5 L min

Indexed as

Critical CareTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyEchocardiographyHemodynamicsHumansVentricular Function, Right

Identifiers

PMID35504927
PMCPMC9065036
OpenAlexW4225303393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.