ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis - a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone-Sparing Hip Arthroplasty in Young and Active Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- What is the long-term survivorship, complication profile, and patient reported outcomes after Birmingham hip resurfacing?Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: is it safe and reliable? A synopsis of the past, the present, and the future of HRA.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Comparing 1-year and 10-year whole blood metal ion results following Birmingham hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYoung men with osteoarthritis of the hip are a growing segment of the population requiring arthroplasty, and there is compelling evidence that the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system provides good functional outcomes and durability in young, active men. We reviewed the survivorship and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent BHR with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
methodsWe analyzed survivorship using the Kaplan-Meier method. Functional scoring was performed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, and a visual analogue scale (VAS).
resultsIn total, 211 patients (243 hips) were included in the study. Of these, 107 patients (127 hips) were available for long-term clinical follow-up, with a mean duration of 12.4 ± 1.4 years. The proportion of male participants with BHRs surviving past 13 years was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.9%-100%) compared with 87% (95% CI 77.8%-97.3%) of female patients. Eleven patients (11 hips) underwent BHR revision. Upon final follow-up, the median HHS was 93.9 in males and 93.6 in females (
conclusionThis study confirms that BHR provides good to excellent functional outcomes, lasting functional improvements, and acceptable durability beyond 10 years in men. Survivorship following BHR is inferior in women; however, HHS and VAS scores were similar in women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.