Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35504446›Full record

Trial reportVirus research2022

Mouthrinses against SARS-CoV-2 - High antiviral effectivity by membrane disruption in vitro translates to mild effects in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Toni Luise Meister, Josef-Maximilian Gottsauner, Barbara Schmidt, Natalie Heinen, Daniel Todt, Franz Audebert, Felix Buder, Henriette Lang, André Gessner, Eike Steinmann and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Virus research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimal effective concentration combinations (OPECCs) for binary application of membrane-targeting antiseptics and TMPyP-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Journal of oral microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Toni Luise MeisterDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Josef-Maximilian GottsaunerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmidtInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Natalie HeinenDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Daniel TodtDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany; European Virus Bioinformatics Center (EVBC), Jena, Germany.
Franz AudebertPraxiszentrum Alte Mälzerei, Regensburg, Germany.
Felix BuderInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Henriette LangPraxiszentrum Alte Mälzerei, Regensburg, Germany.
André GessnerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Eike SteinmannDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Veronika VielsmeierDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: veronika.vielsmeier@ukr.de.
Stephanie PfaenderDepartment for Molecular & Medical Virology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Electronic address: stephanie.pfaender@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
Fabian CieplikDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: fabian.cieplik@ukr.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents an unprecedented threat for the human population, necessitating rapid and effective intervention measures. Given the main infection route by airborne transmission, significant attention has been bestowed upon the use of antiseptic mouthrinses as a way to possibly reduce infectious viral titers. However, clinical evaluations are still sparse. Thus, we evaluated a wide variety of antiseptic agents that can be used as mouthrinses for their antiviral effects in vitro and their respective mode of action. One of the most promising antiseptic agents (benzalkoniumchloride, BAC) was used in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial with subsequent analysis of viral loads by RT-qPCR and virus rescue in cell culture. Mechanistic analysis revealed that treatment with BAC and other antiseptic agents efficiently inactivated SARS-CoV-2 in vitro by primarily disrupting the viral envelope, without affecting viral RNA integrity. However, the clinical application only resulted in a mild reduction of viral loads in the oral cavity. These results indicate that gargling with mouthrinses comprising single antiseptic agents may play a minor role towards a potential reduction of transmission rates and thus, these findings are of utmost importance when considering alternative COVID-19 prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsHumansSARS-CoV-2Viral LoadAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAntiviral AgentsAntiseptic agentsBenzalkonium chlorideCapsid protection assayMouthrinseMouthwashSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35504446
PMCPMC9057949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.