Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503784›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Keeping in step with the young: Chronometric and kinematic data show intact procedural locomotor sequence learning in older adults.

Leif Johannsen, Erik Friedgen, Denise Nadine Stephan, Joao Batista, Doreen Schulze, Thea Laurentius, Iring Koch, Leo Cornelius Bollheimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leif JohannsenInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2441-3163
Erik FriedgenInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-7473
Denise Nadine StephanInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Joao BatistaMedical Clinic VI-Geriatrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Doreen SchulzeMedical Clinic VI-Geriatrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Thea LaurentiusMedical Clinic VI-Geriatrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Iring KochInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-8220
Leo Cornelius BollheimerMedical Clinic VI-Geriatrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence learning in serial reaction time tasks (SRTT) is an established, lab-based experimental paradigm to study acquisition and transfer of skill based on the detection of predictable stimulus and motor response sequences. Sequence learning has been mainly studied in key presses using visual target stimuli and is demonstrated by better performance in predictable sequences than in random sequences. In this study, we investigated sequence learning in the context of more complex locomotor responses. To this end, we developed a novel goal-directed stepping SRTT with auditory target stimuli in order to subsequently assess the effect of aging on sequence learning in this task, expecting that age-related performance reductions in postural control might disturb the acquisition of the sequence. We used pressure-sensitive floor mats to characterise performance across ten blocks of trials. In Experiment 1, 22 young adults demonstrated successful acquisition of the sequence in terms of the time to step on the target mat and percent error and thus validated our new paradigm. In Experiment 2, in order to contrast performance improvements in the stepping SRTT between 27 young and 22 old adults, motion capture of the feet was combined with the floor mat system to delineate individual movement phases during stepping onto a target mat. The latencies of several postural events as well as other movement parameters of a step were assessed. We observed significant learning effects in the latency of step initiation, the time to step on the target mat, and motion parameters such as stepping amplitude and peak stepping velocity, as well as in percent error. The data showed general age-related slowing but no significant performance differences in procedural locomotor sequence learning between young and old adults. The older adults also had comparable conscious representations of the sequence of stimuli as the young adults. We conclude that sequence learning occurred in this locomotor learning task that is much more complex than typical finger-tapping sequence learning tasks, and that healthy older adults showed similar learning effects compared to young adults, suggesting intact locomotor sequence learning capabilities despite general slowing and normal age-related decline in sensorimotor function.

Indexed as

LearningPostural BalanceAgedAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35503784
PMCPMC9064075
OpenAlexW4225406366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.