ArticleMicrobial genomics2022
Whokaryote: distinguishing eukaryotic and prokaryotic contigs in metagenomes based on gene structure.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Quadrupling" the protein family space with global metagenomics.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The planktonic microbiome of the Great Barrier Reef.Nature · 2026Article
- Eukaryotic metagenome-assembled genomes recovered from deep metagenomic sequencing of the seagrass,Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Nucleomorph phylogenomics suggests a deep and ancient origin of cryptophyte plastids within Rhodophyta.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Decoding extremophiles: insights from bioinformatics, machine learning, and data-driven approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Water mass specific genes dominate the Southern Ocean microbiome.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Experimental insights in taxon-specific functional responses to droughts in glacier-fed stream biofilms.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Chemosynthesis enables microbial communities to flourish in a marine cave ecosystem.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- metagRoot: a comprehensive database of protein families associated with plant root microbiomes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Nuclear genome sequencing reveals the highly intron-rich architecture of the chlorarachniophyte alga Amorphochlora amoebiformis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025Article
- Evolution of gut microbiota across honeybee species revealed by comparative metagenomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Evolutionary History and Modern Diversity of Triterpenoid Cyclases.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Metagenomes from cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms from lakes in Ohio (USA).Microbiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- The evolutionary history and modern diversity of triterpenoid cyclases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Tracing non-fungal eukaryotic diversity via shotgun metagenomes in the complex mudflat intertidal zones.mSystems · 2025Article
- Soil microbial responses to multiple global change factors as assessed by metagenomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Eukfinder: a pipeline to retrieve microbial eukaryote genome sequences from metagenomic data.mBio · 2025Article
- Probing the eukaryotic microbes of ruminants with a deep-learning classifier and comprehensive protein databases.Genome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomics has become a prominent technology to study the functional potential of all organisms in a microbial community. Most studies focus on the bacterial content of these communities, while ignoring eukaryotic microbes. Indeed, many metagenomics analysis pipelines silently assume that all contigs in a metagenome are prokaryotic, likely resulting in less accurate annotation of eukaryotes in metagenomes. Early detection of eukaryotic contigs allows for eukaryote-specific gene prediction and functional annotation. Here, we developed a classifier that distinguishes eukaryotic from prokaryotic contigs based on foundational differences between these taxa in terms of gene structure. We first developed Whokaryote, a random forest classifier that uses intergenic distance, gene density and gene length as the most important features. We show that, with an estimated recall, precision and accuracy of 94, 96 and 95 %, respectively, this classifier with features grounded in biology can perform almost as well as the classifiers EukRep and Tiara, which use k-mer frequencies as features. By retraining our classifier with Tiara predictions as an additional feature, the weaknesses of both types of classifiers are compensated; the result is Whokaryote+Tiara, an enhanced classifier that outperforms all individual classifiers, with an F1 score of 0.99 for both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, while still being fast. In a reanalysis of metagenome data from a disease-suppressive plant endospheric microbial community, we show how using Whokaryote+Tiara to select contigs for eukaryotic gene prediction facilitates the discovery of several biosynthetic gene clusters that were missed in the original study. Whokaryote (+Tiara) is wrapped in an easily installable package and is freely available from https://github.com/LottePronk/whokaryote.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.