ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2022
Endotracheal Aspirate and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonates: Revisiting an Age-Old Debate.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognosis of neonates receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in low-resource settings: a systematic review and prognostic meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Biofilm Formation on Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tubing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Culture Data and Sampling Method.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the utility of endotracheal aspirates (ETA) for analyzing microbiological yield, incidence, risk factors for VAP, and clinically relevant outcomes.
methodsVentilated neonates suspected to have VAP were studied prospectively; they were classified as "VAP" or "No VAP" based on a predefined combination of clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria. The microbiological yield from blood and ETA cultures was analyzed.
resultsOf 165 neonates who were ventilated for > 48 h, 65 were suspected of having VAP. Thirty-six (22.9%) were classified as VAP. Microbiological agents could be identified in 31 cases (86.1%) by ETA/blood cultures. Acinetobacter sp was the common organism identified. Duration of ventilation, and a higher number of reintubations before suspicion of VAP were significant risk factors for VAP. Positive ETA culture was associated with a greater duration of oxygen therapy and ventilation days after suspicion of VAP.
conclusionsThe commonest culture yield from ETA in those suspected to have VAP was gram-negative bacilli. Duration of ventilation and reintubations were identified as significant risk factors for VAP. These are potentially modifiable factors. Positive ETA culture was associated with longer needs for respiratory supports. Negative ETA culture might encourage clinicians to stop antibiotics.
trial registrationClinical Trials Registry of India No. CTRI/2019/03/017912, www.ctri.nic.in.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.